How sweet is the light, what a delight for the eyes to behold the sun! Even if a man lives many years, let him enjoy himself in all of them, remembering how many the days of darkness are going to be. The only future is nothingness!
Ecclesiastes 11:7-8


December 29, 2011

As the curtain greatfully drops on 2011, the year turns out to have been a remarkable exercise in cinematic repetition. So far, the top seven pictures at the domestic box office have been sequels, an alignment that appears unmatched in movie history. In terms of ticket sales the most popular seven films to date have been Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2; Transformers: Dark of the Moon; Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn — Part 1; The Hangover Part II; Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides; Fast Five; and Cars 2. The strong opening for Mission: Impossible — Ghost Protocol suggests that it may well join a list that also includes Rise of the Planet of the Apes, from yet another film series, in the ninth position. hollywood signIf Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows or Alvin and the Chipmunks: Chipwrecked gain some more traction, the year’s entire Top 10 may turn out to have been sequels (and their titles will have exhausted the well of awkward punctuation). Studio executives fed this year’s trend with a flight to financial safety that has been building for a decade. At least 10 of about 30 major studio films released in the spring-summer blockbuster season were sequels or remakes, and another three — Thor, Green Lantern, and Captain America: The First Avenger — were based on comics whose kinship with existing films allowed them to play like parts of a franchise. In 2012, much like this year, the major studios will offer about 10 sequels or “reboots” (wherein a familiar series starts again, from the top), featuring the return of proven draws like Spider-Man and the Bourne spy cycle, this time with Jeremy Renner as a new hero. As a contrast, in 1993, all 10 of the top box office performers, including Jurassic Park, Mrs. Doubtfire, and The Fugitive, were freshly conceived films, whether based on an original script or adapted from another medium. There is no place for originality when greed is most important.

December 26, 2011

After the 40-14 Denver Broncos’ loss to the Buffalo Bills Saturday, Bill Maher tweeted, “Wow, Jesus just fucked #TimTebow bad! And on Xmas Eve! Somewhere in hell Satan is tebowing, saying to Hitler ‘Hey, Buffalo’s killing them.’” I’m not a fan of Bill Maher, but I was thinking pretty much the same thing about Tebow. As you would expect, the well-deserved dig didn’t go over well with Christians. Fox Business’ “Follow the Money” host Eric Bolling got things rolling with his Twitter response: “Bill Maher is disgusting vile trash. Tim-Tebow Prayer1I can’t even repeat what he just tweeted about Tebow...on Christmas Eve. .straighttohellBill.” Others of the overtly devout have even called for a boycott of HBO, the home of Maher’s show, “Real Time.” Though utterly unimportant, this little episode illustrates the two competing worldviews in the contemporary United States. On the one hand, a public figure justifiably satirizes another public figure for the inconsistencies in his very public religiousness. That is, if Tim Tebow is going to claim that Jesus guides him and helps him succeed, as he does every time he prays in public about his performance, then he is open to criticism when he throws 4 interceptions in a game. I guess Jesus was distracted or decided not to help him. But Maher made no mention of stopping Tebow from his public displays, however offensive they may be. On the other hand, you have the fascist approach that believes, and in this case also tweets, that anyone who expresses an opinion different from their own is “vile trash” and should be silenced. Couldn’t be more pleased with the level of public discourse in our great and god-fearing nation.

December 16, 2011

A new survey shows Mormon women outnumber men in the LDS Church — and the gap appears to be widening, especially in Utah. Sociologists Rick Phillips, of the University of North Florida, and Ryan Cragun, of the University of Tampa, suggest it could be because Mormon men in the Beehive State are abandoning their faith at a greater rate than women. But other scholars see an array of possible reasons, including the view that more women than men join the Utah-based Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. The report, Mormons in the United States 1990-2008: Socio-Demographic Trends and Regional Differences, relies on data culled from the American Religious Identification Survey, which is built on a large, nationally representative sample of 113,723 respondents in 1990, including 1,742 self-identified Mormons, and 54,461 people with 783 Mormons in 2008. Cannot_MormonChildren were not counted in the survey. It found that 60 percent of Utah Mormons are women, up from 52.5 percent two decades ago. It also showed that the state’s Mormon majority continues to shrink, down to 57 percent, although Utah remains the only state where a religious denomination accounts for more than half the populace. Like most Christian denominations in the United States, Mormonism “has a surplus of women,” Phillips and Cragun write. “In 1990, this surplus was more pronounced among Mormons outside Utah, where 54.9 percent of Latter-day Saints were female, compared to 52.5 percent in Utah. By 2008, a dramatic shift had occurred. While the male-to-female ratio actually narrowed somewhat in most of the nation, it widened significantly in Utah. Females now outnumber males in Utah 3 to 2.” In the past, Mormon men remained tied to the church rather than lose their social standing in the community, argue Phillips and Cragun, both on the board of the Mormon Social Science Association. “However, declining Mormon majorities [in Utah] may have weakened that link, and Mormon men who lack a strong subjective religious commitment to the church are now free to apostatize without incurring sanctions in other social settings.”

December 15, 2011

Almost nine years after the first American tanks began the illegal invasion, today the Pentagon declared an official end to its mission in Iraq, closing a troubled conflict that helped reshape American politics, bankrupt both countries, and leave a bitter legacy of anti-American sentiment across the Muslim world. Defense Secretary Freedom_Not3Leon E. Panetta marked the occasion with a speech in a fortified concrete courtyard at the Baghdad airport. The Bush administration began the war in 2003 to rid Iraq of weapons of mass destruction. When that pretext was shown to be a conscious lie, the war was re-cast as an effort to bring democracy to the Middle East, another pretext that rang hollow. Iraq still has the second largest oil reserves in the world. All along, the war was about stealing Iraq’s oil. The ceremony today marked an uneasy moment of closure for the United States, with no clear sense of what has been won. But it is clear what has, so far, been lost: according to Pentagon statistics, as of last Friday, the war had claimed 4,487 American lives, with 32,226 Americans wounded in action. The number of Iraqi deaths is unclear, but it is in the hundreds of thousands, and all indications are, that number will continue to grow. Is this a great country, or what?

December 14, 2011

The world is even smaller than you thought. Adding a new chapter to the research that cemented the phrase “six degrees of separation” into the language, scientists at Facebook and the University of Milan reported recently that the average number of acquaintances separating any two people in the world was not six but 4.74. The original “six degrees” finding, published in 1967 by the psychologist Stanley Milgram, was drawn from 296 volunteers who were asked to send a message by postcard, through friends and then friends of friends, to a specific person in a Boston suburb. The new research used a slightly bigger cohort: 721 million Facebook users, more than one-tenth of the world’s population. The findings have been posted on Facebook’s site. The experiment took one month. The researchers used a set of algorithms developed at the University of Milan to calculate the average distance between any two people by computing a vast number of sample paths among Facebook users.  They found that the average number of links from one arbitrarily selected person to another was 4.74. In the United States, where more than half of people over 13 are on Facebook, Six_degrees_of_separationit was just 4.37. However, a Microsoft study in 2008, using a more conservative definition of friend, found an average chain of 6.6 people in a group of 240 million who exchanged chat messages. Eric Horvitz, a Microsoft researcher who led the study in 2008, said that network was based on people who exchanged messages, rather than those who identified as “buddies.” “When considering even the most distant Facebook user in the Siberian tundra or the Peruvian rain forest,” the company wrote on its blog, “a friend of your friend probably knows a friend of their friend.” The caveat there is “Facebook user” — like the Milgram study, the cohort was a self-selected group, in this case people with online access who use a particular Web site. Though the study was by far the largest of its kind, it raised questions about definitions of terms like “friend” on Facebook. Jon Kleinberg, a computer science professor at Cornell and a faculty adviser to an author of the new study, said some links might be more meaningful than others. Matthew O. Jackson, an economist at Stanford who studies social networks, raised questions about the bias built into a study based on random samples. He said the study confirmed Facebook’s success in being where millions of people communicate. “It’s more evidence that they’ve been enormously successful at connecting a large number of people very well,” he said. The research underscores the growing power of the emerging science of social networks, in which scientists study the ways people interact by crunching gigantic sets of Internet data and how it has drawn people more tightly together, for better or worse.

December 13, 2011

The notebooks in which Sir Isaac Newton worked out the theories on which much classical scienceIsaac_Newton is based have been put online by Cambridge University. More than 4,000 pages have been scanned, including his annotated copy of Principia Mathematica, containing Newton's laws of motion and gravity. Newton wrote mainly in Latin and Greek, the scientific language of his time, and was reluctant to publish. The university plans to put almost all of its Newton collection online. The papers mark the launch of the Cambridge Digital Library project to digitize its collections. Check out this video. Really, really cool.

December 11, 2011

The past decade has been the hottest on record, according to a report released in November. The World Meteorological Organization (WMO), the UN's weather agency, blamed rising levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere for a trend which has seen 13 of the 15 warmest years on record occur since 1997. According to WMO Secretary General Michel Jarraud "Concentrations of greenhouse gasses in the atmosphere have reached new highs. Our science is solid and it proves unequivocally that the world is warming and this warming is due to human activities." The WMO said 2011 would likely end as the 10th warmest year since record-keeping began in 1850. 2011 was influenced by an especially strong La Nina event, smoke-stacksa phenomenon driven by cooler than average sea temperatures in the Pacific and frequently tied to extreme conditions in Asia, Africa and South America. A La Nina – the opposite of an El Nino event – tends to have a cooling effect on average global temperatures. 2011 has been the hottest year in which a La Nina occurred. This year's La Nina was linked to flooding in Thailand, drought in eastern Africa and the southern United States, and recent incedibly high winds that damaged much of the west coast and intermountain west. Elsewhere, Arctic sea ice shrunk to its lowest volume on record this year– some 4,200 cubic kilometers. By surface area, ice dropped about 35 percent below the 1979-2000 average to arrive at its second-lowest point. The record-low was set in 2007. According to the report, “We are very rapidly approaching levels consistent with a 2-2.4 degree Centigrade rise in average global temperatures which scientists believe could trigger far reaching and irreversible changes in our Earth, biosphere and oceans." Concentrations of the main greenhouse gasses blamed for climate change were growing more rapidly than during the 1990s. Carbon dioxide rose by 2.3 parts per million (ppm) in the sapce of a year to reach 389 ppm in 2010. That compares to an annual average rise of 1.5 ppm during the 1990s.

December 10, 2011

2010 census data show that 49.1 million Americans are below the poverty line — in general, $24,343 for a family of four. An additional 51 million are in the next category, which is termed “near poor” — with incomes less than 50 percent above the poverty line. That is, one in three Americans — 100 million people — is either poor or perilously close to it. As for all of that inspirational, up-by-their-bootstrap talk you hear on the Republican campaign trail, over half of the near poor in the new tally actually fell into that group from higher income levels as their resources were sapped by medical expenses, taxes, work-related costs, and other unavoidable outlays. The worst downturn since the Great Depression is only part of the problem. Before that, living standards were already being eroded by stagnating wages and tax and economic policies that favored the wealthy. Conservative politicians and analysts are spouting their usual denial. Gov. Rick Perry and Representative Michele Bachmann have called for taxing the poor and near poor more heavily, poverty-in-america1on the false grounds that they have been getting a free ride. In fact, low-income workers do pay up, if not in federal income taxes, then in payroll taxes and state and local taxes. Robert Rector, an analyst at the conservative Heritage Foundation says that the “emotionally charged terms ‘poor’ or ‘near poor’ clearly suggest to most people a level of material hardship that doesn’t exist.” Heritage has its own, very different ranking system, based on households’ “amenities.” According to that, the typical poor household has roughly 14 of 30 amenities. In other words, how hard can things be if you have a refrigerator, air-conditioner, coffee maker, cellphone, and other stuff? The rankings ignore the fact that many of these are requisites of modern life and that things increasingly out of reach for the poor and near poor — education, health care, child care, housing and utilities — are the true determinants of a good, upwardly mobile life, what “the American Dream” was supposed to be. Government surveys analyzed by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities indicate that in 2010, just over half of the country’s nearly 17 million poor children, lived in households that reported at least one of four major hardships: hunger, overcrowding, failure to pay the rent or mortgage on time, or failure to seek needed medical care. A good education is also increasingly out of reach. A study by Martha Bailey, an economics professor at the University of Michigan, showed that the difference in college-graduation rates between the rich and poor has widened by more than 50 percent just since the 1990s. Yeah, this really is the greatest country in the world.

December 8, 2011

Most of us don’t know much about our great-grandparents. Mormons probably know more than most people because of the emphasis on genealogy. But even Mormons don’t have access to much information about them. I’m doing some research on my great-grandfather Russell and his aunt, and even though they were both public figures for a while, there isn’t a lot of information about them, especially personal information. What there is consists of a few photographs, what they wrote, and what a few others wrote about them. But that absence of information is something that will be forever changed as a result of the hundreds of thousands of pieces of digital content the average person can now produce in a lifetime. Garfield Smelter BaseballOur descendants will have at their fingertips a deep digital archive of information that we created ourselves. That's one of the things the social media revolution means: most of us can easily produce, are producing, a digital legacy whether we intend to or not. The quantity of content we're producing, and technology's ability to make sense of it, continue to expand exponentially, so that, it will inevitably become possible to much more fully recreate our lives. For example, the average Facebook user shares 90 pieces of information per month, ranging from status updates, to photos, to videos, to links to a trail of the places they've been. Over the course of a lifetime, that's a tremendous amount of personal information and insight into how a person thinks, how they act, and whom they interact with, while all of that data is being indexed in the cloud. And social media, still just a decade old, will continue to evolve and offer far more robust ways of interacting and projecting ourselves digitally. If we take advantage of the digital tools that are blossoming all around us, our descendants can come to know us far better than we have been able to know our ancestors. I, for one, think that is wonderful.

December 6, 2011

December 6, 2011

President Barack Obama
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW
Washington, D.C. 20500

Dear Mr. President,
We write to express our strong support for your recent decision to bring our troops home from Iraq by year’s end. We were relieved to learn that our service men and women will be home from Iraq for the holidays.

The ongoing war in Afghanistan, by contrast, threatens to stretch our commitment into another decade. In August you announced the gradual removal of the “surge” troops, and yet over 70,000 troops will remain in Afghanistan at this time next year. This is unsustainable and counterproductive. There is unanimous agreement that the future of Afghanistan depends on Afghans and their regional allies implementing a political solution. There is simply no military solution to the current challenges in Afghanistan and maintaining an American military presence only delays the inevitable political process while putting our brave men and women in uniform in harms’ way.

Furthermore, it is crucial that Congress plays its proper Constitutional role in any decision to leave U.S. troops in a potential combat zone. While the United States is currently scheduled to hand over full control over security and remove all combat troops by the end of 2014, a new agreement could result in an indefinite military commitment and significant financial costs, all without further Congressional approval. Dating back to 2009, eleven acts authorizing and funding troop presence in Afghanistan have included a provision specifically prohibiting the establishment of permanent bases in Afghanistan. Any agreement that obliges the U.S. to a security commitment in Afghanistan must be bound by the Constitution, and be specifically authorized by an Act of Congress, or with the advice and consent of the Senate.

While reports indicate that President Karzai plans on requiring any future strategic partnership agreement with the U.S. to be approved by the Afghan Parliament, a traditional tribal gathering, or both, there is no plan to have similar Congressional input. It is unconscionable that America could make new, lasting military commitments of tens of thousands of soldiers and hundreds of billions of dollars without express approval from Congress.

Rebuilding America must remain our top priority, and this should be reflected in our budgetary priorities. We need to end the wars and invest the savings in job creation for our future.

Sincerely,
Congressmembers Barbara Lee and Walter Jones
now with 30 other congressmember co-signers

November 24, 2011

Decided to have a traditional Thanksgiving celebration this year. I invited the neighbors over, then after dinner killed them all off.

Happy Thanksgiving!

Thanksgiving5

November 22, 2011

A very sad anniversary:

November 18, 2011

Cartoon from Pat Bagley:

Bagley Cartoon 11182011

Right on the money, so to speak.

November 12, 2011

The Hubble Space Telescope, despite being in the last phase of its tenure in orbit, continues to offer new glimpses into the universe. Now the telescope has peered deep into space and 10 billion years into the past and delivered new images of 18 dwarf galaxies that are, to the excitement of scientists, creating stars at an extremely rapid rate. In fact, the galaxies are churning out stars at such a rate that the number of stars in them would double in just 10 million years. To form stars so rapidly you must have an enormous amount of gas condensing in the cores of these galaxies. By comparison, our galaxy, the much older and larger Milky Way, Dwarf Galaxy1has taken a thousand times longer to double its star count. The observations were part of the Cosmic Assembly Near-infrared Deep Extragalactic Legacy Survey (CANDELS), an ambitious three-year project that studies the most distant galaxies in the universe. CANDELS is using Hubble to image a much larger region of space than was observed before, and is going extremely deep into the infrared end of the light spectrum to pick up the faintest specks of light. The new discovery came when CANDELS found a population of small "dwarf" galaxies that were unusually bright in one particular wavelength. They have turned up in the Hubble images because the radiation from young, hot stars has caused the oxygen in the gas surrounding them to light up like a fluorescent sign. Galaxies with rapidly forming stars characteristically feature huge quantities of oxygen, an element astronomers were not expecting to find. Many current models suggest dwarf galaxies form stars more slowly, over billions of years, to gradually build up to what we see today. However, the implications of these observations is that galaxies form the bulk of their stars extremely rapidly in a burst of star formation. This turns our picture of star formation on its head. Dwarf Galaxy ngc1569_hstAstronomers are able to make detailed analyses of dwarf galaxies because there are other, much closer, examples orbiting the Milky Way, which can be used for comparison. On top of that, there was the significant fact that so many dwarf galaxies were discovered apparently behaving the same way at the same time indicating that this must be a very common process. It's not yet clear exactly how old these dwarf galaxies are, though they must be significantly younger than the Milky Way. Similarly, astronomers cannot be sure how many generations of stars have appeared previously in those galaxies, since the new wave of star births is outshining any older siblings they have. The big mystery is why this population of young galaxies was creating stars at such a high rate. Alas, the Hubble may not be around to unravel that one. The aging telescope has now been in orbit around the Earth since 1990, and received one last upgrade - which included the Wide Field Camera 3 used by CANDELS - in 2009.

November 9, 2011

According to a Commerce Department report, Exploring the Digital Nation — Computer and Internet Use at Home, 82.3% of Utah homes are connected to the internet, the highest percentage in the country. 79.7 percent are connected via high-speed broadband, and another 2.6 percent have dial-up service. Nationally, 68 percent of homes have broadband connections and another 3 percent have dial-up. No. 2 behind Utah is New Hampshire, where 77.8 percent of homes have broadband and 3.2 percent have dial-up. Lowest in the nation is Mississippi, where 51.7 percent have broadband and 6 percent have dial-up. Internet WorldThere are three components to its No. 1 ranking. Utah has the nation’s youngest average age, and youth demand and use the Internet more than older people. Utah’s population is concentrated almost exclusively in the urban strip along the Wasatch Front where the Internet is easily accessible. The report indicates that 70 percent of the nation’s urban population has broadband service, while only 57 percent of rural residents do. And Utah has a high-tech tradition that may have made Internet use more common ealier than other states. The University of Utah was part of a small four-university computer network with UCLA, Stanford, and the University of California-Santa Barbara that was the early precursor to the Internet. The study also indicates that the most important reasons homes are without the Internet include: lack of need or interest (47%), lack of affordability (24%), and an inadequate computer (15%). Utah also has the highest rate in the nation of homes with computers — 86.7 percent. Mississippi was the lowest at 67.5 percent. It said computers are still the principal way to access the Internet although access by devices such as cellphones and tablets is growing rapidly.

October 31, 2011

Although there is more than enough food to feed the world's growing population, the global economic system benefits the industrialized nations in a way that creates hunger in developing countries. Every 3 seconds, someone starves to death. Halloween-witch

In the United States, every celebration is turned into a reason to buy.

Happy Halloween.

October 30, 2011

Recently Citigroup had to pay a $285 million fine to settle a case in which, with one hand, Citibank sold a package of toxic mortgage-backed securities to unsuspecting customers — securities that it knew were likely to go bust — and, with the other hand, shorted the same securities — that is, bet millions of dollars that they would go bust. It doesn’t get any more immoral than that. Our financial industry (actually, their financial industry) has grown so large and rich it has corrupted our real institutions through political donations. Wall StreetAs Senator Richard Durbin of Illinois said bluntly in a 2009 radio interview, despite having caused this crisis, these same financial firms “are still the most powerful lobby on Capitol Hill. And they, frankly, own the place.” Congress today is a forum for legalized bribery. One consumer group using information from Opensecrets.org calculates that the financial services industry, including real estate, spent $2.3 billion on federal campaign contributions from 1990 to 2010, which was more than the health care, energy, defense, agriculture, and transportation industries combined. Why are there 61 members on the House Committee on Financial Services? Congressmen want to be in a position to sell votes to Wall Street. God bless America.

October 25, 2011

Brand-new research finds that people who drink coffee are at reduced risk of developing basal cell carcinoma, the most common form of skin cancer. And the more they drink, the lower the risk. The research, presented recently at a meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research in Boston, looked at coffee consumption and the risk of three forms of skin cancer - basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and the rarer and more deadly melanoma - among about 113,000 participants in two long-term health surveys. Though easily treated through minor surgery and not typically deadly, cup-of-coffeebasal cell carcinoma can, if left untreated, spread to other parts of the body. Those with a history of basal cell carcinoma are at increased risk of more dangerous squamous cell carcinoma and melanoma. The data came out of the Nurses' Health Study out of Brigham and Women's Hospital and the Health Professionals' Follow-Up Study at the Harvard School of Public Health. They found 25,480 incidences of skin cancer, 22,786 of the basal cell carcinoma, 1,953 squamous cell carcinoma and 741 melanoma. The data showed that women who consumed more than three cups of caffeinated coffee a day had a 20 percent lower risk of basal cell carcinoma compared with those who drank less than a cup a month. For men, the reduced risk was more modest, just 9 percent. But those percentages add up, given that about 1 million new cases of basal cell carcinoma are diagnosed each year. The researchers found no reduction in skin cancer risk among those who drank decaffeinated coffee. The study adds to a growing body of research supporting coffee's health benefits. Both green tea and caffeinated coffee have been shown to have anti-cancer properties and other health benefits. A word or wisdom?

October 21, 2011

"Today, I can report that, as promised, the rest of our troops in Iraq will come home by the end of the year...After a decade of war, the nation that we need to build — and the nation that we will build — is our own.” 
                                                                          President Obama

Great, great news, only nine years too late.
Torture Statue
Now we just need to get out of Afghanistan.

October 19, 2011

House Republicans approved an egregious measure last week that would shrink access to abortion to the point of endangering women’s lives. Currently, hospitals receiving federal money must administer necessary emergency medical services to pregnant women, including abortion. However, the Protect Life Act would allow hospitals to refuse to perform an emergency abortion on religious or moral grounds even if a woman’s life was at stake. Representative Joe Pitts, the Pennsylvania Republican who introduced the bill, contends it involves no new risk to women. That is a lie. This could be life-threatening to women, especially those living in communities with only one hospital. gun_to_her_head1Catholic hospitals alone account for about 15 percent of the nation’s hospital beds. The need to accommodate religious doctrine does not give health providers serving the general public license to deny essential care. Beyond emergency treatment, the Pitts bill would effectively ban insurance coverage for abortion in the new state health insurance exchanges set up as part of health care reform, even though the reform law already places unnecessary restrictions on insurers and the insured to make sure no federal money is used to pay for abortions. The bill would also allow states to override the health reform law’s requirement that new insurance plans cover certain preventive health services without a co-pay, potentially making birth control a target. For now, the measure has little chance of becoming law, with Democrats controlling the Senate and President Obama in the White House. But with state abortion restrictions proliferating, the bill is another warning that supporters of women’s reproductive rights need to push back a lot harder.

October 10, 2011

It has been a record year for new legislation designed to make it harder for Democrats to vote — 19 laws and two executive actions in 14 states dominated by Republicans, according to a new study by the Brennan Center for Justice. As a result, more than five million eligible voters will have a harder time participating in the 2012 election. Of course the Republicans passing these laws never acknowledge their real purpose, which is to turn away from the polls people who are more likely to vote Democratic, particularly the young, the poor, the elderly and minorities. They insist that laws requiring government identification cards to vote are only to protect the sanctity of the ballot from unscrupulous voters. Cutting back on early voting, which has been popular among working people who often cannot afford to take off from their jobs on Election Day, will save money, they claim. None of these explanations are true. There is almost no voting fraud in America. And none of the lawmakers who claim there is have ever been able to document any but the most isolated cases. The only reason Republicans are passing these laws is to give themselves a political edge by suppressing Democratic votes. I VotedThe most widespread hurdle has been the demand for photo identification at the polls, a departure from the longstanding practice of using voters’ signatures or household identification like a utility bill. Seven states this year have passed laws requiring strict photo ID to vote, and similar measures were introduced in 27 other states. More than 21 million citizens — 11 percent of the population — do not have government ID cards. Many of them are poor, or elderly, or black and Hispanic and could have a hard time navigating the bureaucracy to get a card. In Kansas, the secretary of state, Kris Kobach (who also wrote Arizona’s notorious anti-immigrant law), pushed for an ID law on the basis of a list of 221 reported instances of voter fraud in Kansas since 1997. Even if that were true, it would be an infinitesimal percentage of the votes cast during that period, but it is not true. When The Wichita Eagle looked into the local cases on the list, the newspaper found that almost all were honest mistakes: a parent trying to vote for a student away at college, or signatures on mail-in ballots that didn’t precisely match those on file. In one case of supposed “fraud,” a confused non-citizen was asked at the motor vehicles bureau whether she wanted to fill out a voter registration form, and did so not realizing she was ineligible to vote. Some of the desperate Republican attempts to keep college students from voting are almost comical in their transparent partisanship. No college ID card in Wisconsin meets the state’s new stringent requirements (as lawmakers knew full well), so the elections board proposed that colleges add stickers to the cards with expiration dates and signatures. Republican lawmakers protested that the stickers would lead to — yes, voter fraud. Other states are beginning to require documentary proof of citizenship to vote, or are finding other ways to make it harder to register. Some are cutting back on programs allowing early voting, or imposing new restrictions on absentee ballots, alarmed that early voting was popular among black voters supporting Barack Obama in 2008. In all cases, they are abusing the trust placed in them by twisting democracy’s machinery to partisan ends.

October 7, 2011

From Paul Krugman:
There’s something happening here. What it is ain’t exactly clear, but we may, at long last, be seeing the rise of a popular movement that, unlike the Tea Party, is angry at the right people. When the Occupy Wall Street protests began three weeks ago, most news organizations were derisive if they deigned to mention the events at all. For example, nine days into the protests, National Public Radio had provided no coverage whatsoever. It is, therefore, a testament to the passion of those involved that the protests not only continued but grew, eventually becoming too big to ignore. With unions and a growing number of Democrats now expressing at least qualified support for the protesters, Occupy Wall Street is starting to look like an important event that might even eventually be seen as a turning point. Occupy_Wall_Street_BullWhat can we say about the protests? First things first: The protesters’ indictment of Wall Street as a destructive force, economically and politically, is completely right. A weary cynicism, a belief that justice will never get served, has taken over much of our political debate — and, yes, I myself have sometimes succumbed. In the process, it has been easy to forget just how outrageous the story of our economic woes really is. So, in case you’ve forgotten, it was a play in three acts. In the first act, bankers took advantage of deregulation to run wild (and pay themselves princely sums), inflating huge bubbles through reckless lending. In the second act, the bubbles burst — but bankers were bailed out by taxpayers, with remarkably few strings attached, even as ordinary workers continued to suffer the consequences of the bankers’ sins. And, in the third act, bankers showed their gratitude by turning on the people who had saved them, throwing their support — and the wealth they still possessed thanks to the bailouts — behind politicians who promised to keep their taxes low and dismantle the mild regulations erected in the aftermath of the crisis. Given this history, how can you not applaud the protesters for finally taking a stand? Now, it’s true that some of the protesters are oddly dressed or have silly-sounding slogans, which is inevitable given the open character of the events. Occupy_Wall_Street_Goethe_SmallBut so what? I, at least, am a lot more offended by the sight of exquisitely tailored plutocrats, who owe their continued wealth to government guarantees, whining that President Obama has said mean things about them than I am by the sight of ragtag young people denouncing consumerism. Bear in mind, too, that experience has made it painfully clear that men in suits not only don’t have any monopoly on wisdom, they have very little wisdom to offer. When talking heads on, say, CNBC mock the protesters as unserious, remember how many serious people assured us that there was no housing bubble, that Alan Greenspan was an oracle and that budget deficits would send interest rates soaring. A better critique of the protests is the absence of specific policy demands. It would probably be helpful if protesters could agree on at least a few main policy changes they would like to see enacted. But we shouldn’t make too much of the lack of specifics. It’s clear what kinds of things the Occupy Wall Street demonstrators want, and it’s really the job of policy intellectuals and politicians to fill in the details. Rich Yeselson, a veteran organizer and historian of social movements, has suggested that debt relief for working Americans become a central plank of the protests. I’ll second that, because such relief, in addition to serving economic justice, could do a lot to help the economy recover. I’d suggest that protesters also demand infrastructure investment — not more tax cuts — to help create jobs. Occupy_Wall_Street_Execute_32Neither proposal is going to become law in the current political climate, but the whole point of the protests is to change that political climate. And there are real political opportunities here. Not, of course, for today’s Republicans, who instinctively side with those Theodore Roosevelt-dubbed “malefactors of great wealth.” Mitt Romney, for example — who, by the way, probably pays less of his income in taxes than many middle-class Americans [and believes corporations are people] — was quick to condemn the protests as “class warfare.” But Democrats are being given what amounts to a second chance. The Obama administration squandered a lot of potential good will early on by adopting banker-friendly policies that failed to deliver economic recovery even as bankers repaid the favor by turning on the president. Now, however, Mr. Obama’s party has a chance for a do-over. All it has to do is take these protests as seriously as they deserve to be taken. And if the protests goad some politicians into doing what they should have been doing all along, Occupy Wall Street will have been a smashing success. They’ve even reached Utah, the redest of red states:

Leah Hogsten | The Salt Lake Tribune
 Occupy SLC rallied on Capitol Hill  Thursday, October 6 2011, followed by a march from throughout downtown to Pioneer Park where they set up a base camp and plan to remain until their voices are heard. The group opposes corporate greed and feel the government is out of touch with the people. They claim to be the 99 percent that has no voice.

October 6, 2011

While I hear it’s been in the 80s in Minnesota, in Utah, we skipped right past autumn and went directly to winter:

Snow in early October

October 1, 2011

Looks like autumn is finally on its way:

image

September 22, 2011

Slave1On this date in 1862, President Abraham Lincoln issued the preliminary Emancipation Proclamation, declaring all slaves in rebel states should be free as of January 1, 1863.

September 20, 2011

People with diabetes are at increased risk of having a heart attack or stroke at an early age, and diabetes appears to dramatically increase a person's risk of developing Alzheimer's disease or other types of dementia later in life, according to a new study conducted in Japan and led by Yutaka Kiyohara, M.D., an environmental medicine researcher at Kyushu University, in Fukuoka. The study included more than 1,000 men and women over age 60. At the beginning, tests showed that 15% of the participants had full-fledged diabetes, while 23% had prediabetes, also known as impaired glucose tolerance. Diabetes2The participants were all dementia-free when the tests were done, but over the next 15 years 23% received a diagnosis of dementia. Slightly less than half of those cases were deemed to be Alzheimer's disease, with the remainder roughly split between vascular dementia and dementia due to other causes. The diagnoses were confirmed with brain scans of living patients and brain autopsies in deceased patients. Both diabetes and prediabetes were associated with an increased risk of dementia diagnosis, although the association was weaker for prediabetes. And the link persisted even after the researchers took into account several factors associated with both diabetes and dementia risk, such as age, sex, blood pressure, and body mass index. The researchers found that people with diabetes were twice as likely as the other study participants to develop Alzheimer's disease within 15 years. They were also 1.75 times more likely to develop dementia of any kind. alzheimers_gfxDiabetes could contribute to dementia in several ways, which researchers are still sorting out. Insulin resistance, which causes high blood sugar and in some cases leads to type 2 diabetes, may interfere with the body's ability to break down a protein (amyloid) that forms brain plaques that have been linked to Alzheimer's. High blood sugar (glucose) also produces certain oxygen-containing molecules that can damage cells, a process known as oxidative stress. In addition, high blood sugar -- along with high cholesterol -- plays a role in the hardening and narrowing of arteries in the brain. This condition, known as atherosclerosis, can bring about vascular dementia, which occurs when artery blockages (including strokes) kill brain tissue. Studies dating back to the late 1990s have suggested that people with diabetes are more likely to develop Alzheimer's disease and other types of dementia. The next step will be to understand whether controlling blood sugar and reducing risk factors for type 2 diabetes also reduces dementia risk. Before it’s too late, I’d just like to say, it’s been nice to know you.

September 13, 2011

From the Salt Lake Tribune:
Ever since the LDS Church declared its support for the Utah Compact, advocating compassion in the illegal immigration debate, and support of Utah’s guest-worker law, tea-party Mormons have seemed to waver between following their church leaders or Glenn Beck. Delegates at Republican conventions, while debating whether to ask for the Legislature’s repeal of the guest-worker bill, argued among themselves about the church’s role in the issue, whether it had a right to express an opinion, and what its statements really meant. Now we have the definitive answer from a former Arizona state senator who ran in the Republican primary for governor of that state last year and is a loudly proclaimed tea-party Mormon steeped in the belief she and all other good people are surrounded by government conspiracies. senator-karen-johnsonArizona State Sen. Karen Johnson says her beloved Mormon Church was brainwashed by evil liberals. And now, she surmises, Mormon leaders have something in common with the news media: They wallow in ignorance by opposing her righteousness. Yep, in the world of Johnson and the tradition of Mormon conservatives in her area of Mesa, Ariz., the LDS Church in Utah is now a liberal bastion. Johnson, who gave a speech in the Arizona Senate in 2008 alleging the collapse of the Twin Towers on 9/11 was the result of government conspiracy, wrote a lengthy piece on her blog last week that claims the Utah Compact was a carefully crafted conspiracy that sucked Mormon leaders in by using LDS code words. Johnson, who was named worst legislator of the year by the Arizona Republic in 2002, charged in her editorial that nobody would claim authorship of the Utah Compact which, among other things, advocates keeping families together when dealing with undocumented workers who Johnson and other tea partiers say should all be deported. She had harsh words for such liberal radicals as Salt Lake Chamber of Commerce President and former president of the Utah Senate Lane Beattie. Another liberal rascal revealed by her research is Paul Mero, of the Sutherland Institute (and you thought that was a conservative think tank). She unmasked the plot by pointing out that Chamber of Commerce executive Natalie Gochnour couldn’t say in a television interview who was the actual author of the compact. Johnson mocked Gochnour’s answer that up to 100 people had input into the final product. But Johnson found out that the real culprit was longtime political consultant Carter Livingston, a Democrat. Livingston was working with the Washington, D.C.-based National Immigration Forum and, in an interview uncovered by Johnson, said that in order to work with the conservative culture in Utah to arrive at a solution, he tried to find common ground, like keeping families together. And that’s what duped the church, says Johnson. The Arizona political culture from which Johnson comes is the same culture that created the political philosophy of Utah Eagle Forum president Gayle Ruzicka, who, while living in Arizona was part of the political machine that elected former Republican Gov. Evan Mecham, later disgraced by scandal. Ruzicka moved to Utah after that and has been molding Utah County in the image of Mesa ever since.

September 12, 2011

This is what I wrote in my journal about yesterday:
Can’t really stand having the TV on now or reading the papers. Everything is about feeding our orgy of self pity on the 10th anniversary of 9/11 without any intelligent discussion of the causes or what has happened since. The way that event was politicized and used to undermine the democratic elements of our republic has tainted it for me.
This is what Paul Krugman wrote:
The fact is that the two years or so after 9/11 were a terrible time in America WTC– a time of political exploitation and intimidation, culminating in the deliberate misleading of the nation into the invasion of Iraq. It’s probably worth pointing out that I’m not saying anything now that I wasn’t saying in real time back then, when Bush had a sky-high approval rating and any criticism was denounced as treason. And there’s nothing I’ve done in my life of which I’m more proud. It was a time when tough talk was confused with real heroism, when people who made speeches, then feathered their own political or financial nests, were exalted along with – and sometimes above – those who put their lives on the line, both on the evil day and after. So it was a shameful episode in our nation’s history – and it’s one that I can’t help thinking about whenever we talk about 9/11 itself. Now, I should have said that the American people behaved remarkably well in the weeks and months after 9/11: There was very little panic, and much more tolerance than one might have feared. Muslims weren’t lynched, and neither were dissenters, and that was something of which we can all be proud. But the memory of how the atrocity was abused is and remains a painful one. And it’s a story that I, at least, can neither forget nor forgive.

September 6, 2011

How many species are there on this planet? In 1691, the scientist John Ray estimated that there were 20,000 species of insects. His numbers were significantly off — so far, at least a million insect species have been described. But he reached that estimate the way most scientists still do, by extrapolating from the number of already known species. Three centuries later, there is still no scientific consensus on the total number of species. The most rigorous attempt at a statistical analysis of the problem, a recent study led by scientists at Dalhousie University, concludes that there are about 8.7 million species on Earth. The team analyzed the numerical relationship between species, genus, family, and order in well-studied life-forms and used that pattern to estimate the number of species in categories of life that haven’t been well studied. Klimt-tree-of-life-lgSome scientists argue that that almost surely underestimates some lesser-known classes of life. Only 1.25 million species have been described in the 253 years since Linnaeus devised the method we use to name them. This means that if there are, indeed, roughly 8.7 million species over all, nearly 90 percent of the species on Earth have not yet been discovered and described. According to the study, it would take another 1,200 years to provide a scientific description of them all at our current pace. (The study estimates that it would take 303,000 taxonomists working full tilt just to provide the most basic scientific description of all the unknown species.) At the rate we are losing species, a huge number currently alive will have gone extinct in that time. And that 8.7 million? It doesn’t include the species of bacteria, which may number in the millions. So, while we are learning more each day, it is still true to say that no matter how much we think we know about life on Earth, we know almost nothing; except, perhaps, that Life is varied and extraordinary beyond even our imaginings.

September 2, 2011

There’s good news and bad news about Utah, which is kind of an improvement because usually there is only bad news. Keeping with tradition, the bad news first:
A 2007 survey by the Utah Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice put Utah’s reported rape rate at 63.7 per 100,000 mormon-family2females compared to the U.S. rate of 57.4 per 100,000 females. The survey also found that nearly one-third of Utah (still 60% Mormon) women surveyed had some type of sexual assault during their lifetimes. Surveys have shown that in many cases where family members are the perpetrators, other family members of the victim advise them not to tell authorities because they fear damage to the family image. That’s right, families are forever.

Next, the good news:
One characteristic about Salt Lake City that you may not have guessed is that it has the third-highest rate of same-sex couples among America’s mid-size cities (those with populations between 100,000 and 250,000). It even ranks in the top 10 for same-sex couples of all cities, with such well-known liberal places as Berkeley, Calif.; Cambridge, Mass.; and Madison, Wis. Salt Lake City has 17.31 same-sex couples per 1,000 households, with 1,290 such couples overall. Lesbian Wedding2That is more than double the national rate of 7.7. “It doesn’t surprise me,” Salt Lake City Mayor Ralph Becker said. “I have known as mayor, and as anyone here who pays attention also knows, that we have a relatively large and active LGBT [lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender] community.” A series of state-by-state data releases from the 2010 census containing data on same-sex couples was recently completed, allowing national comparisons. The Williams Institute at the UCLA School of Law used it to rank states, counties, and cities. On the census form, a household head indicated that a second adult of the same sex is a spouse or an “unmarried partner.” The study uses census data on same-sex couple households to estimate the size of the LGBT population. That indicates about 8.5 percent of adults in Salt Lake City identify themselves as LGBT, compared with 3.8 percent of adults nationally. mormon-missionaries2Among large cities with populations of more than 250,000 people, San Francisco has the highest rate of same-sex couples at 33.41 per 1,000 residents, followed by Seattle at 25.54 and Oakland, Calif., at 24.61. The proportion of households with same-sex couples in Salt Lake City is similar to that of Denver, Boston, and even Manhattan, which has 19.32 per 1,000 households. Cities like Salt Lake City, Denver, Atlanta, and Minneapolis have a “regional draw” for LGBT people who are looking to live in a more accepting city without leaving their home state or region. In the past, it was more common to move to San Francisco or New York, but now it’s easier to find a welcoming climate closer to home. Jakob Crawford, a 21-year-old gay man who lives in Salt Lake City, agrees. “Gay people in Utah come to Salt Lake City because it’s almost like an island of liberal progressives in a sea of conservative Mormon culture,” he says.

August 29, 2011

Women’s rights are increasingly under attack in the United States. Since last year, 13 states, including Kansas, have enacted laws banning insurance coverage of abortion in the health insurance exchanges created by the federal health care reform law. Some states have gone even further, aggressively restricting abortion coverage even in private insurance plans sold outside the exchanges. The Kansas statute, which is being challenged in court, forbids abortion coverage (except to save a woman’s life) in comprehensive insurance plans sold in the state, but permits companies to sell a separate rider covering abortion care for an additional cost. It also bars abortion services in policies sold after 2014 in the new exchanges. That part of the law, which also contains only a single exception limited to life endangerment, does not allow for a separate rider for broader abortion coverage. The lawsuit, filed by the American Civil Liberties Union in Federal District Court in Kansas, argues persuasively that the law is unconstitutional because it essentially levies a tax on a constitutionally protected procedure. venus_symbol_female_women_girlsIt also charges that the ban on abortion coverage amounts to sex discrimination because it prevents women from buying plans covering all of their health care needs while imposing no limitations on men’s medical needs. The suit comes amid a flurry of court decisions on other abortion-related restrictions. In recent weeks, federal judges in Indiana, Kansas, and North Carolina have granted preliminary injunctions against state measures barring the use of Medicaid and federal family-planning money at Planned Parenthood clinics serving low-income women. In late June, a federal district judge in South Dakota blocked as unconstitutional a state law imposing a 72-hour waiting period for abortion services, the longest in the country. The same law also subjects women seeking abortions to counseling at so-called pregnancy help centers run by antiabortion activists. In July, a federal judge in Kansas preliminarily enjoined a new licensing law that imposes onerous and medically unnecessary requirements on the state’s three remaining abortion providers. Unfortunately, an Arizona state court refused this month to block several bad provisions enacted in 2009, including one limiting the work of nurse practitioners, which has caused Planned Parenthood to scale back its services. Since a majority of Americans support a woman’s right to an abortion, the self-righteous have to use deceptive methods such as these to further restrict women’s legal rights. These cases highlight the deviousness of the ongoing attack on women’s freedom by conservatives.

August 27, 2011

For a hundred years, poll taxes were used throughout the South to keep African-Americans from voting. As Representative John Lewis points out:
Despite decades of progress, this year’s Republican-backed wave of voting restrictions has demonstrated that the fundamental right to vote is still subject to partisan manipulation. The most common new requirement, that citizens obtain and display unexpired government-issued photo identification before entering the voting booth, was advanced in 35 states and passed by Republican legislatures in Alabama, Minnesota, Missouri, and nine other states — despite the fact that as many as 25 percent of African-Americans lack acceptable identification. civil_rights1Having fought for voting rights as a student, I am especially troubled that these laws disproportionately affect young voters. Students at state universities in Wisconsin cannot vote using their current IDs (because the new law requires the cards to have signatures, which those do not). South Carolina prohibits the use of student IDs altogether. Texas also rejects student IDs, but allows voting by those who have a license to carry a concealed handgun. These schemes are clearly crafted to affect not just how we vote, but who votes. Conservative proponents have argued for photo ID mandates by claiming that widespread voter impersonation exists in America, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary. While defending its photo ID law before the Supreme Court, Indiana was unable to cite a single instance of actual voter impersonation at any point in its history. Likewise, in Kansas, there were far more reports of U.F.O. sightings than allegations of voter fraud in the past decade. These theories of systematic fraud are really unfounded fears being exploited to threaten the franchise. In Georgia, Florida, Ohio, and other states, legislatures have significantly reduced opportunities to cast ballots before Election Day — an option that was disproportionately used by African-American voters in 2008. kkkIn this case the justification is often fiscal: Republicans in North Carolina attempted to eliminate early voting, claiming it would save money. Fortunately, the effort failed after the State Election Board demonstrated that cuts to early voting would actually be more expensive because new election precincts and additional voting machines would be required to handle the surge of voters on Election Day. Voters in other states weren’t so lucky. Florida has cut its early voting period by half, from 96 mandated hours over 14 days to a minimum of 48 hours over just eight days, and has severely restricted voter registration drives, prompting the venerable League of Women Voters to cease registering voters in the state altogether. Again, this affects very specific types of voters: according to the nonpartisan Brennan Center for Justice, African-Americans and Latinos were more than twice as likely as white voters to register through a voter registration drive. These restrictions purportedly apply to all citizens equally. In reality, we know that they will disproportionately burden African Americans and other racial minorities, yet again. They are poll taxes by another name.

August 24, 2011

There’s a new billboard along the 2100 South freeway just west of 5600 West in Salt Lake City. “Don’t believe in God?” it asks. “You are not alone.” The billboard was purchased by the Utah Coalition of Reason with a grant from the Washington D.C.-based United Coalition of Reason, and it will remain up through Sept. 19. “We’re hoping to reach a lot of people on their way to the Utah State Fair,” said Elaine Ball, director of the Utah coalition. “We want everybody to know we’re coming together as people who are atheists, agnostic, or freethinking and open to discussing ideas. Atheist BillboardWe’re not trying to convert or de-convert people.” The Utah Coalition of Reason also seeks to act as a counterbalance to public discussions embracing religion and the blurring of lines between church and state. “It’s a concern that candidates embrace God publicly,” she said. “We’re in a political climate where it’s not acceptable to embrace humanism. We’d like to change that.” Among other things, the Salt Lake City billboard is part of a national campaign that seeks to remove any social stigma from those who do not believe in a deity. Non-believers are inundated with religious messages at every turn. This is just one, tiny counter assertion. The day after an article appeared, a local newspaper columnist wrote about being showered with emails denouncing the atheist billboard in terms he could not print. They are most afraid of “freethinking and open to discussing ideas”, attributes very rare in Utah and completely absent from Utah politics.

August 21, 2011

Throughout history, societies have struggled with how to deal with children and childhood. In the United States and elsewhere, a broad-based “child saving” movement emerged in the late 19th century to combat widespread child abuse in mines, mills, and factories. By the early 20th century, the “century of the child,” as a prescient book published in 1909 called it, was in full throttle. Most modern states embraced the general idea that government had a duty to protect the health, education, and welfare of children. Child labor was outlawed, as were the sale and marketing of tobacco, alcohol, and pornography to children. Consumer protection laws were enacted to regulate product safety and advertising aimed at children. By the middle of the century, childhood was a robustly protected legal category. Gavin PointingIn 1959, the United Nations issued its Declaration of the Rights of the Child. Children were now legal persons; the “best interests of the child” became a touchstone for legal reform. But the 20th century also witnessed another momentous shift, one that would ultimately threaten the welfare of children: the rise of the for-profit corporation. Lawyers, policy makers, and business lobbied successfully for various rights and entitlements traditionally connected, legally, with personhood. New laws recognized corporations as legal — albeit artificial — “persons,” granting them many of the same legal rights and privileges as human beings. In an eerie parallel with the child-protective efforts, “the best interests of the corporation” was soon introduced as a legal precept. A clash between these two newly created legal entities — children and corporations — was, perhaps, inevitable. Century-of-the-child reformers sought to resolve conflicts in favor of children. But over the last 30 years there has been a dramatic reversal: corporate interests now prevail. Deregulation, privatization, weak enforcement of existing regulations, and legal and political resistance to new regulations have eroded our ability, as a society, to protect children. Childhood obesity mounts as junk food purveyors bombard children with advertising, even at school. A recent Kaiser Family Foundation study reports that children spend more hours engaging with various electronic media — TV, games, videos and other online entertainments — than they spend in school. Much of what children watch involves violent, sexual imagery, and yet children’s media remain largely unregulated. Attempts to curb excesses — like California’s ban on the sale or rental of violent video games to minors — have been struck down by courts as free speech violations. Gavin in Garden 2011-2Another area of concern: we medicate increasing numbers of children with potentially harmful psychotropic drugs, a trend fueled in part by questionable and under-regulated pharmaceutical industry practices. In the early 2000s, for example, drug companies withheld data suggesting that such drugs were more dangerous and less effective for children and teenagers than parents had been led to believe. The law now requires “black box” warnings on those drugs’ labels, but regulators have done little more to protect children from sometimes unneeded and dangerous drug treatments. Children today are also exposed to increasing quantities of toxic chemicals. We know that children, because their biological systems are still developing, are uniquely vulnerable to the dangers posed by many common chemical compounds. We also know that corporations often use such chemicals as key ingredients in children’s products, saturating their environments. Yet these chemicals remain in circulation, as current federal laws, enacted with corporate profits in mind, demand unreasonably high proof of harm before curbing a chemical’s use. The challenge before us is to reignite the guiding ethos and practices of the century of the child. As Nelson Mandela has said, “there can be no keener revelation of a society’s soul than the way in which it treats its children.” By that measure, our current failure to provide stronger protection of children in the face of corporate-caused harm reveals a sickness in our societal soul. Greed is strangling us all, and, as always, children are harmed the most.

August 17, 2011

A dispute over breast-feeding at a Salt Lake City grocery store has sparked plans for a nationwide nurse-in this Saturday, when moms armed with hungry babies are expected to descend on dozens of Whole Foods Markets. Angelina Love, 23, was nursing her 17-month-old son while shopping at the Trolley Square store this June when an employee asked her to cover up. Another customer had complained after seeing Love feed her child with her tank top-style dress pulled down beneath her left breast. Love was shocked. “A breast-feeding woman is feeding her child,” she said this week. “She’s not exposing herself.” An employee explained that some customers found the behavior offensive. Several other employees arrived and said there were other places in the store she could nurse with more privacy, such as the cafĂ©. BreastFeeding1They said they were trying to please everybody. “You’re putting shame on me and my family by telling me to cover up or asking me to move,” Love said she told the employees. The mother and employees couldn’t come to any resolution, so Love took the manager’s phone number and walked out of the store with her family. Now she is asking Whole Foods to develop a pro-breast-feeding policy and training that would prevent a similar confrontation from happening again. The corporation, which is welcoming the nurse-in, says such a change is in the works. “The bottom line is some people made some mistakes and we have addressed that internally,” said Libba Letton, a Whole Foods spokesperson. “This nurse-in is a great way to bring attention to an important issue.” Utah has one of the highest percentages of breast-feeding moms in the nation, according to the 2011 report card from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Nearly 85 percent of children are breast-fed at some point, with 61.5 percent still nursing at six months, compared to 44.3 percent nationwide. If Love returns to Whole Foods and nurses her son, she will not be asked to cover herself, Letton said. A complaining customer would be told about the policy. But Love said, “I’m not going to shop in that store again until they make it sure this won’t happen again. Nursing a child is normal and not something unsightly that should be hidden.” I agree, and to support that, I plan to be at Whole Foods Saturday to keep an eye on things.